* No Top Ten spot for Dimitrov after loss to Muller in Rotterdam
* Monfils tops Bautista Agut; closes in on return to Top Twenty
* Karlovic second victim of Krajicek’s breakthrough event in Memphis; Nishikori barely survives against Harrison
* Almagro upsets countryman Tommy Robredo in Sao Paulo
Rotterdam
Singles – First Round: (1) A Murray def. (Q) N Mahut 6-3 6-2
A potential first step toward a return to the #3 ranking for Andy Murray, although he needs a lot more than this.
Singles – First Round: (4) S Wawrinka def. (WC) J Huta Galung 6-3 3-6 6-3
This wasn’t a particularly long match — about an hour and forty minutes, and it would have been shorter had Stan Wawrinka not fired multiple lets on match points — but if Wawrinka wants to get his ranking back up, he’ll need to do better than this. He still needs at least three more wins to rise above his current #8.
Singles – First Round: G Garcia-Lopez def. D Istomin 7-6(7-5) 6-4
There is a chance this will put Guillermo Garcia-Lopez in the Top 25. Another win would just about guarantee it.
Singles – First Round: A Seppi def. (WC) R Haase 6-7(5-7) 6-3 6-3
Robin Haase’s ranking has gone into the tank, which is why he needed a wildcard here. Maybe he needs to take some lessons from Andreas Seppi, who suddenly is in very good form although this won’t yet improve his ranking.
Singles – Second Round: G Muller def. (5) G Dimitrov 6-2 7-6(10-8)
Grigor Dimitrov had some trouble in the first round, and obviously more here. That means he won’t be reaching the Top Ten; Marin Cilic will keep the #10 spot. Gilles Muller continues to climb the rankings; this will likely take him above #35. At this rate, he’ll be seeded at the summer Slams. He probably can’t do much on clay, but that serve alone will make him dangerous at Wimbledon!
Singles – Second Round: G Monfils def. (7) R Bautista Agut 7-5 7-6(7-5)
Gael Monfils just fell out of the Top Twenty. By the looks of things, he wants back in — although this won’t quite do it; he needs one more victory. Roberto Bautista Agut won’t rise above his current #16, although there is only a very slight chance he will fall.
Singles – Second Round: S Stakhovsky def. D Thiem 6-1 6-3
Dominic Thiem loses a few points and will probably fall to right around #50.
Doubles – First Round: (2) Granollers/Lopez def. Kohlschreiber/Melzer 6-4 6-2
Doubles – First Round: Inglot/Mergea def. (Q) Fleming/Marray 6-2 7-6(7-2)
Sao Paulo
Singles – Second Round: N Almagro def. (2) T Robredo 6-3 7-6(7-1)
Nicolas Almagro still has points to defend, but his Top Hundred spot now looks quite secure. Tommy Robredo loses points — he and Almagro were both semifinalists this week last year — but he remains #17 for now; there is still a chance he could lose the spot, but we’d guess he’ll keep it.
Singles – Second Round: (4) L Mayer def. A Ramos-Vinolas 6-4 3-6 6-1
This will probably suffice to keep Leonardo Mayer Top Thirty, although it isn’t quite certain yet.
Singles – Second Round: (5) P Cuevas def. (LL) F Bagnis 5-1, retired (left shoulder)
The body giveth, and the body taketh away: A withdrawal put Facundo Bagnis in the draw, and now he’s withdrawn himself. Pablo Cuevas will probably return to the Top Thirty if he wins his next match.
Doubles – First Round: Lorenzi/Schwartzman def. (1) Peya/Soares 4-6 6-4 10-8
Peya/Soares came here a mere co-#22 in the doubles Race. They really need to find that magic something they’ve lost….
Doubles – First Round: (2) Cabal/Farah def. (WC) Demoliner/Dutra Silva 7-6(7-5) 4-6 10-6
Doubles – First Round: Cermak/Vesely def. (4) Cuevas/Marrero 7-5 6-7(2-7) 15-13
Hard to believe, with a scoreline line that, that this match lasted only an hour and 38 minutes. But both teams were very strong on serve, with just three breaks in the match.
Doubles – First Round: Andujar/Marach def. Carreno Busta/Gimeno-Traver 7-6(7-4) 6-4
Doubles – First Round: Barrientos/Giraldo def. Haider-Maurer/Ramos-Vinolas 6-3 6-3
Doubles – First Round: Sa/Souza def. M Gonzalez/Monaco 7-6(7-4) 7-6(7-3)
Memphis
Singles – Second Round: (1) K Nishikori def. (Q) R Harrison 3-6 6-3 6-4
Kei Nishikori’s camp has been talking about him rising to #3 or #4. Not this week, though. He’s the defending champion here, and could well fall to #6 if he doesn’t do well. So this was a rather scary start.
Singles – Second Round: (3) J Isner def. I Dodig 6-4 7-6(7-5)
When John Isner is getting in 80% of his first serves, as he was in the first set of this match, you aren’t going to break him. It’s that simple. Ivan Dodig didn’t even get a break point — and he faced just enough to be broken once. Isner didn’t serve quite as well in the second set, but not enough to affect the result. He hasn’t earned enough points to count, though.
Singles – Second Round: (Q) A Krajicek def. (5) I Karlovic 7-6(7-5) 4-6 6-4
This is quite literally the best ATP result of Austin Krajicek’s career — he had only one previous ATP win, and now he has two here. Ivo Karlovic, who lost despite hitting 32 aces, was last year’s finalist, so he’ll fall from #25 to no better than #28; we’d guess he’ll end up a spot or two lower.
Singles – Second Round: S Querrey def. (WC) J Donaldson 6-4 6-1
Not a particularly competitive match, obviously, but Jared Donaldson at least earned his first-ever ATP win. Not too bad for someone who is only eighteen years old. If Sam Querrey can win his next match — against pal John Isner — he’ll probably return to the Top Forty.
Doubles – First Round: Huey/Lipsky def. (2) Groth/Guccione 7-5 6-4
It’s rather surprising Huey/Lipsky weren’t seeded here; it is not a strong draw. No doubt Groth/Guccione wish they had been seeded….
Doubles – First Round: Smith/Venus def. (WC) Kozlov/Kudla 6-3 6-1
Doubles – First Round: Sitak/Young def. Johnson/Querrey 6-1 6-4
It continues to be a very good year for Artem Sitak, who already has nine doubles victories in 2015.
In columns toward the end of last year, we have looked at the rankings based on round points, and on quality points, and found some interesting hints about player performance. But is that all we can do with these numbers?
Assuredly not. Because we can see who had, or would have had, the most extreme ratios of round to quality points. Why does this matter? Because the guys who earn the most quality points relative to their round points are certainly the biggest upset artists, and if they’re young, there is a fair chance that this indicates that they will go a lot higher. The guys who have the lowest quality point ratios, on the other hand, are likely taking advantage of weak draws, or something, to crank up their rankings.
Keep in mind that this is based on the 2014 year-end data; the numbers would change somewhat if we were to do it today, but only slightly, since most 2014 results are still on the books.
To give a baseline, we took every player with ten or more ATP main draws and found his quality-to-round points ratio. For these players collectively, the ratio was 0.198 — that is, if we lumped together all the players’ points, they earned 0.198 quality points for every round point, or 198 quality points for every 1000 round points.
If we took the individual players and averaged their Q-to-R ratios, that turned out to be 0.223. Why so much higher? Probably because the guys with the most quality points were the top players, Djokovic and Federer in particular. They don’t have as many quality points available (since they cannot beat both #1 and #2 in an event!), so their ratios are inherently lower, and they pulled down the collective ratio. In any case, it’s the 0.223 number that tells us what to expect from the various players. Also, it’s important to know the median Q-to-R ratio. That turns out to be .215. And the standard deviation is .095. This is interesting and useful, because it turns out that the distribution of Q-to-R ratios is roughly normal or “bell-shaped.” So about two-thirds of the ratios should be within one standard deviation of the mean of 0.223, and about 95% will be within two standard deviations. We’ll organize the data accordingly. We once again take the players with ten or more ATP events, although we’ll throw in a few numbers for other players at the end.
So here is the list, in order of decreasing ratios (in other words, the first players we list have the highest ratio of quality points to round points, meaning that they are probably the biggest upset artists).
Players very far above average: Quality-to-round ratios more than two standard deviations above the mean (i.e. more than 0.412):
Brown: ratio=0.688
Brands: ratio=0.649
Devvarman: ratio=0.504
Daniel Brands doesn’t surprise us; he had a breakthrough season in 2013, then got hurt, so it makes sense that he would sometimes pull off big upsets. Somdev Devvarman’s case is somewhat similar. We’re not as sure about Dustin Brown, but the consensus has always been that he has shots but not much control over them — a common recipe for an upset artist.
Players far above average: Ratios from one to two standard deviations above the mean (i.e. more than 0.318 but less than .412):
Kukushkin: ratio=0.384
Dolgopolov: ratio=0.37
Berlocq: ratio=0.363
Haase: ratio=0.351
Matosevic: ratio=0.350
Tsonga: ratio=0.336
Thiem: ratio=0.332
Lu: ratio=0.326
Kukushkin is certainly an upset artist. Dolgopolov is a player who has shown incredible potential but lost his consistency last year. Ditto Tsonga, in a way. Thiem is highly promising. Haase is skilled but slumping, so it’s perhaps not surprising that he pulls off upsets on his good days. The rest… we can’t comment on.
Players slightly above average: Ratios from zero to one standard deviations above the mean (i.e. more than 0.223 but less than .318):
Melzer: ratio=0.313
Garcia-Lopez: ratio=0.313
Johnson: ratio=0.304
Sock: ratio=0.303
Stakhovsky: ratio=0.3
Przysiezny: ratio=0.285
Benneteau: ratio=0.284
Nieminen: ratio=0.267
Almagro: ratio=0.267
Lopez: ratio=0.263
Vesely: ratio=0.263
Gabashvili: ratio=0.26
Stepanek: ratio=0.26
Monaco: ratio=0.258
Karlovic: ratio=0.258
Monfils: ratio=0.256
Haas: ratio=0.256
Struff: ratio=0.252
Sijsling: ratio=0.251
Klizan: ratio=0.25
Querrey: ratio=0.249
Giraldo: ratio=0.249
Sela: ratio=0.248
Janowicz: ratio=0.244
Anderson: ratio=0.244
Montanes: ratio=0.239
Baghdatis: ratio=0.239
Falla: ratio=0.239
Bautista Agut: ratio=0.238
Rosol: ratio=0.237
Hanescu: ratio=0.235
Mannarino: ratio=0.235
Istomin: ratio=0.234
Robredo: ratio=0.233
Carreno Busta: ratio=0.23
De Schepper: ratio=0.226
Bellucci: ratio=0.226
There isn’t much we can say about this except to note the interesting fact that not one Top Ten player is in this group. We have some of the Top Twenty (Lopez, Monfils, Anderson, Bautista Agut, Robredo) — but it’s clear that it really is hard for the top players to earn high numbers in this regard.
Players slightly below average: Ratios from zero to one standard deviations below the mean (i.e. less than 0.223 but more than .128):
Granollers: ratio=0.218
Gulbis: ratio=0.218
Chardy: ratio=0.217
Gasquet: ratio=0.216
Seppi: ratio=0.216
Dodig: ratio=0.216
Davydenko: ratio=0.215
Verdasco: ratio=0.214
Youzhny: ratio=0.208
Hewitt: ratio=0.205
GonzalezA: ratio=0.203
Goffin: ratio=0.201
Lorenzi: ratio=0.2
Tursunov: ratio=0.198
Andujar: ratio=0.198
Delbonis: ratio=0.197
Cuevas: ratio=0.197
Kohlschreiber: ratio=0.197
Pospisil: ratio=0.196
Young: ratio=0.196
Roger-Vasselin: ratio=0.195
Simon: ratio=0.193
Gimeno-Traver: ratio=0.193
Nishikori: ratio=0.191
Harrison: ratio=0.19
Mathieu: ratio=0.189
Mahut: ratio=0.183
Cilic: ratio=0.183
Mayer, L: ratio=0.182
Kamke: ratio=0.181
Herbert: ratio=0.18
Ferrer: ratio=0.18
Dimitrov: ratio=0.176
Tomic: ratio=0.173
Ramos-Vinolas: ratio=0.17
Murray: ratio=0.169
Sousa: ratio=0.169
Federer: ratio=0.167
Becker: ratio=0.167
Fognini: ratio=0.162
Isner: ratio=0.158
Berdych: ratio=0.158
Ebden: ratio=0.151
Jaziri: ratio=0.151
Kubot: ratio=0.144
Lajovic: ratio=0.144
Paire: ratio=0.142
Lacko: ratio=0.14
Wawrinka: ratio=0.138
Golubev: ratio=0.136
Raonic: ratio=0.131
This is by far our largest block, with 51 of the 110 players we looked at. Finally we have some Top Ten players: Nishikori is the leader (we’ve seen several other indications that he produces the most upsets in the Top Ten), followed by Cilic, then (to our utter shock) Ferrer, Murray, Federer, Berdych, Wawrinka, and Raonic. That’s eight of the Top Ten. Which leaves two still to be accounted for:
Players well below average: Ratios from one to two standard deviations below the mean (i.e. less than 0.128 but more than 0.034):
Russell: ratio=0.128
Djokovic: ratio=0.127
Nadal: ratio=0.117
Smyczek: ratio=0.115
Nedovyesov: ratio=0.113
Ward: ratio=0.113
Riba: ratio=0.105
Groth: ratio=0.09
Klahn: ratio=0.078
Reister: ratio=0.073
Amazing to see two of the top three (Nadal and Djokovic) this low. This gives us all our players except one:
Players extremely below average: Ratios more than two standard deviations below the mean (i.e. less than 0.034):
Volandri: ratio=0.014
These ratios probably don’t predict future success in general, but it seems pretty clear that Volandri is washed up.
What about players with fewer than ten events? The most extreme case we saw was Yuki Bhambri, who had almost as many quality points as round, but that was all due to one fluke Top Ten win. We’ll ignore that and look only at players with at least four events. Among those players, the highest score is:
Coric: .468
More reason to think we should keep our eyes on him. Others above .318 (one standard deviation above the mean):
Krajinovic: .442
Troicki: .430
F. Mayer: .428
Kyrgios: .362
Berankis: .323
Berankis is dubious, but there is a lot of talent in the rest of that list. For players with limited activity, it seems to indicate real potential.
On the other hand, players below .128 (a standard deviation below the mean) who are fairly well known include, well… nobody. Other than Nadal and Djokovic, that is, who are special cases because their rankings are so high. There didn’t seem to be any other big names below that mark. So it appears we can’t forecast any big declines based on lack of quality points.
KEYWORDS: Round Point to Quality Point Ratios Men
THIS WEEK ON THE ATP WORLD TOUR:
Rotterdam (500/Indoor Hard). Defending Champion: Tomas Berdych
Memphis (250/Indoor Hard). Defending Champion: Kei Nishikori
Sao Paulo (250/Clay). Defending Champion: Federico Delbonis
NEXT WEEK ON THE ATP WORLD TOUR:
Rio de Janeiro (500/Clay). Defending Champion: Rafael Nadal
Marseille (250/Indoor Hard). Defending Champion: Ernests Gulbis
Delray Beach (250/Hard). Defending Champion: Marin Cilic
Estimated ATP World Tour Rankings
As of February 11, 2015
Rank &
Prior…Player………..Points
1..(1) Djokovic……….13045
2..(2) Federer…………9205
3..(3) Nadal…………..5745
4..(4) Murray………….5435
5..(5) Nishikori……….5045
6..(6) Raonic………….4845
7..(7) Berdych…………4250
8..(8) Wawrinka………..4095
9..(9) Ferrer………….3865
10.(10) Cilic…………..3690
11.(11) Dimitrov………..3465
12.(12) Tsonga………….2495
13.(13) Gulbis………….2330
14.(14) Lopez…………..2325
15.(15) Anderson………..2125
16.(16) Bautista Agut……1975
17.(17) Robredo…………1800
18.(18) Isner…………..1765
19.(19) Simon…………..1755
20.(20) Goffin………….1659
21.(21) Monfils…………1635
22.(22) Kohlschreiber……1460
23.(23) Dolgopolov………1420
24.(24) Gasquet…………1410
25.(27) Garcia-Lopez…….1405
26.(28) Benneteau……….1355
27.(26) Fognini…………1320
28.(25) Karlovic………..1295
29.(30) Mayer…………..1264
30.(29) Rosol…………..1245
Rotterdam — Week of February 9
……………..QF
1 Murray
8 Simon
3 Berdych
7 Bautista Agut..Monfils
5 Dimitrov…….Muller
4 Wawrinka
6 Gulbis………Stakhovsky
2 Raonic
STATUS OF SEEDS:
1 Murray
2 Raonic
3 Berdych
4 Wawrinka
5 Dimitrov…….lost 2R (Muller)
6 Gulbis………lost 1R (Thiem)
7 Bautista Agut..lost 2R (Monfils)
8 Simon
Memphis — Week of February 9
………………QF
1 Nishikori…….(1)Nishikori
5 Karlovic……..Krajicek(Q)
3 Isner………..(3)Isner
7 Becker……….Querrey
8 Mannarino
4 Dolgopolov
6 Johnson
2 Anderson (WC)
STATUS OF SEEDS:
1 Nishikori
2 Anderson (WC)
3 Isner
4 Dolgopolov
5 Karlovic……lost 2R (Krajicek)
6 Johnson
7 Becker……..lost 1R (Querrey)
8 Mannarino…..lost 1R (Young)
Sao Paulo — Week of February 9
……………QF
[Vanni(LL)]….
7 Verdasco
4 L Mayer……(4)Mayer
8 Klizan
6 Giraldo
3 Fognini
5 Cuevas……..(5)Cuevas
2 Robredo…….Almagro
STATUS OF SEEDS:
1 Lopez……..WITHDREW
2 Robredo……lost 2R (Almagro)
3 Fognini
4 L Mayer
5 Cuevas
6 Giraldo
7 Verdasco
8 Klizan
WEDNESDAY
Rotterdam
Singles – First Round
(1) A. Murray def. (Q) N. Mahut 6-3 6-2
(4) S. Wawrinka def. (WC) J. Huta Galung 6-3 3-6 6-3
A. Seppi def. (WC) R. Haase 6-7(5-7) 6-3 6-3
G. Garcia-Lopez def. D Istomin 7-6(7-5) 6-4
Singles – Second Round
G. Muller def. (5) G. Dimitrov 6-2 7-6(10-8)
G. Monfils def. (7) R. Bautista Agut 7-5 7-6(7-5)
S. Stakhovsky def. D Thiem 6-1 6-3
Doubles – First Round
(2) Granollers/Lopez def. Kohlschreiber/Melzer 6-4 6-2
Inglot/Mergea def. (Q) Fleming/Marray 6-2 7-6(7-2)
Memphis
Singles – Second Round
(1) K Nishikori def. (Q) R Harrison 3-6 6-3 6-4
(3) J Isner def. I Dodig 6-4 7-6(7-5)
(Q) A Krajicek def. (5) I Karlovic 7-6(7-5) 4-6 6-4
S Querrey def. (WC) J Donaldson 6-4 6-1
Doubles – First Round
Huey/Lipsky def. (2) Groth/Guccione 7-5 6-4
Smith/Venus def. (WC) Kozlov/Kudla 6-3 6-1
Sitak/Young def. Johnson/Querrey 6-1 6-4
Sao Paulo
Singles – Second Round
N. Almagro def. (2) T. Robredo 6-3 7-6(7-1)
(4) L. Mayer def. A. Ramos-Vinolas 6-4 3-6 6-1
(5) P. Cuevas def. (LL) F. Bagnis 5-1, retired (Left Shoulder)
Doubles – First Round
Lorenzi/Schwartzman def. (1) Peya/Soares 4-6 6-4 10-8
(2) Cabal/Farah def. (WC) Demoliner/Dutra Silva 7-6(7-5) 4-6 10-6
Cermak/Vesely def. (4) Cuevas/Marrero 7-5 6-7(2-7) 15-13
Andujar/Marach def. Carreno Busta/Gimeno-Traver 7-6(7-4) 6-4
(WC) Sa/Souza def. Gonzalez/Monaco 7-6(7-4) 7-6(7-3)
Barrientos/Giraldo def. Haider-Maurer/Ramos-Vinolas 6-3 6-3
Content via Bob Larson news service
Topics: Abn Amro World Tennis Tournament, Atp, Memphis Open, Rotterdam, Sao Paulo, Tennis
#TENNIS NEWS FROM #ROTTERDAM AND #MEMPHIS AND SO MUCH STATS, SCORES & MORE- http://t.co/n94i9qo8kV #ATP #abnamrowtt #MemphisOpen #ATPmemphis