Men’s Look Forward: London
If by some chance you happen to think someone other than Novak Djokovic or Roger Federer will win London, now is the time to place your bets. You’ll get good odds.
Djokovic has won the last two editions of the event. Federer won the two before that. That takes us to 2009. The winner that year was Nikolay Davydenko, who is retired. Djokovic won in 2008, Federer in 2007 and 2006. In 2005, David Nalbandian won the event. He’s retired. Federer won in 2004 and 2003. In 2002 and 2001, Lleyton Hewitt won the title; he isn’t here. And every champion before that is retired (and most of them are in the Hall of Fame).
In other words, Djokovic and Federer have, between them, won four in a row, seven of the last eight, and nine of the last eleven; they are the only past champions in the field. And their biggest rival, Rafael Nadal, isn’t here, and fully three of the other six players in the field have never been here before.
On top of that, Federer and Djokovic have between them 129 career titles. The other six players here have just less than half of that, a combined 64 — almost half of them belonging to Andy Murray (who has 31).
Of course, some of that is a matter of youth. Milos Raonic and Kei Nishikori, two of our first-timers, are 23 and 24, respectively, and just coming into their primes. Our other first-timer, Marin Cilic, is 26 — younger than Murray or Djokovic, and much younger than Federer; our first-timers are the youngest of the players here. In this year when two of the four Slams went to players who are not members of the so-called Big Four, perhaps we’re seeing a changing of the guard.
If so, it looks as if Federer is going to bear the brunt of the change. His group appears much tougher, containing as it does Murray (who of course is the only other player in the field with multiple Slams), Nishikori (who, as yesterday’s feature on quality points showed, has the best rate of big wins of anyone on the ATP this year other than Djokovic, Federer, and Nadal), and Raonic (who was the player who beat Federer at Paris as Federer tried to earn the #1 ranking). Djokovic’s group, by contrast, consists of Wawrinka (who is in an awful slump and doesn’t like the surface anyway), Berdych (who likes the surface just fine but never wins the big ones), and Cilic (who has spent the whole fall complaining of being tired). It’s hard to imagine Djokovic not winning his group, and even harder to imagine him doing so badly that he doesn’t make the semifinal. As for the other semifinalist from Group A, we haven’t a clue. Nor would we want to bet on who will win Group B.
There isn’t much to talk about in the doubles; the Bryans of course dominated the sport, and the #2 team in terms of rankings, Nestor/Zimonjic, is splitting — although, given Nestor’s history, that might be a sign that they’re going to win the event. But it won’t make any rankings difference; the Bryans will end up on top. If there is a stealth team to watch out for, it’s probably Rojer/Tecau — with eight titles as a team, they’re second only to the Bryans this year. That’s by far the best either of them has ever done; they seem to be much more than the sum of their parts. We’ve no idea whether that will help them against other top teams.
The Rankings
It’s always fun when the year-end Championships has the chance to settle the year-end rankings. But that’s not at all likely to come up this year. Yes, the #1 ranking is theoretically in play. But Djokovic leads Federer by 1310 points. That means that the only way Federer can rise to #1 this week is if he wins London without loss of a match and Djokovic goes 0-3. Federer could add a few more points in the Davis Cup final, but still, if Djokovic can win even two matches, or if Federer fails to win the title, Djokovic will be the year-end #1.
Below that, things are a lot more fluid. We know that Rafael Nadal will end the year at #3, although perhaps not by much — but from Wawrinka at #4 to Cilic at #9 is only 745 points. Given that this is a 1500 point event, that means that any of the other six players here can end up at any ranking from #4 to #9! In practice, it’s unlikely that Wawrinka and Nishikori will end up below #7, but that’s about all we can say. In particular, Murray, Berdych, and Raonic are only 35 point apart — an effective tie; whoever wins more matches ends up on top. Cilic, 290 points off the pace, is the only one with a specific minimum required to move: He has to win at least two matches, and because the guys he is chasing are likely to pick up some points as well, we’d guess he would need a final to rise above #8.
Estimated ATP World Tour Rankings
As of November 5, 2014
Rank &
Prior…Player………..Points
1..(1) Djokovic……….10010
2..(2) Federer…………8700
3..(3) Nadal…………..6835
4..(4) Wawrinka………..4895
5..(5) Nishikori……….4625
6..(6) Murray………….4475
7..(7) Berdych…………4465
8..(8) Raonic………….4440
9..(9) Cilic…………..4150
10.(10) Ferrer………….4045
11.(11) Dimitrov………..3645
12.(12) Tsonga………….2740
13.(13) Gulbis………….2455
14.(14) Lopez…………..2130
15.(15) Bautista Agut……2110
16.(16) Anderson………..2080
17.(17) Robredo…………2015
18.(18) Isner…………..1890
19.(19) Monfils…………1825
20.(20) Fognini…………1790
21.(21) Simon…………..1730
22.(22) Goffin………….1599
23.(23) Dolgopolov………1455
24.(24) Kohlschreiber……1415
25.(25) Mayer…………..1389
26.(26) Benneteau……….1365
27.(27) Gasquet…………1350
28.(28) Karlovic………..1320
29.(29) Chardy………….1240
30.(30) Rosol…………..1210
DRAWS
London Championships — Week of November 5
GROUP A
(1)Djokovic
(3)Wawrinka
(6)Berdych
(8)Cilic
GROUP B
(2)Federer
(4)Nishikori
(5)Murray
(7)Raonic
***
CONTENT VIA Bob LARSON TENNIS NEWS
Topics: Atp World Tour, Barclays Championships, Federer, Novak Djokovic, Roger Federer, Tennis
MEN’S #TENNIS: A QUICK LOOK @ THE BARCLAYS CHAMPIONSHIPS / @rogerfederer & @DjokerNole ARE THE GUESS- http://t.co/aKF4eMffR4 #Federer